Boring Industries Need Branded Games Most (And Here's Why)
Insurance, logistics, industrial equipment:the least sexy industries gain the most from gamification. Why boring businesses should be building games before sexy startups do.
Boring Industries Need Branded Games Most (And Here's Why)
A logistics company launched a mobile game where players manage supply chains, optimize routes, and solve delivery challenges. It generated 2.3 million downloads and became their most effective recruitment and brand awareness tool.
An insurance company created a risk assessment game where players make decisions and see consequences. It drove more policy quote requests than their entire digital advertising budget.
A commercial HVAC manufacturer built a system design game for contractors. It became the industry standard training tool and locked in brand loyalty for an entire generation of installers.
These aren't sexy consumer tech companies. They're in industries most people find boring: logistics, insurance, industrial equipment. And that's precisely why gamification worked so extraordinarily well for them.
The Boring Industry Advantage
The less inherently exciting your industry, the more impact gamification has. Here's why:
Low Baseline Engagement
Tech/Entertainment Industry Baseline:
- Products are already engaging
- Marketing is already creative
- Competition for attention is fierce
- Audience expects novel experiences
- Hard to stand out with gamification
Boring Industry Baseline:
- Products are functional, not exciting
- Marketing is conservative and bland
- Competition for attention is minimal
- Audience expects nothing interesting
- Easy to stand out with any creativity
When everyone in your industry uses stock photos and generic copy, even basic gamification feels revolutionary.
Attention Monopoly
In sexy industries, gamification competes with dozens of other creative marketing approaches. In boring industries, gamification has no competition.
Result: You capture 100% of the "interesting marketing" mindshare in your industry simply by being the only one doing it.
Example: The logistics game became "the game about logistics" because it was the only one. They owned the entire category by default.
Lower Buyer Expectations
B2B buyers in boring industries don't expect marketing to be engaging. They expect:
- Technical specifications sheets
- Dense white papers
- Boring webinars
- Generic trade show booths
When you exceed these low expectations with interactive, engaging content, the positive surprise is enormous. In sexy industries, buyers are jaded. In boring industries, they're genuinely delighted by any effort to make things interesting.
Higher Information Barrier
Boring industries often have high learning curves:
- Complex products with many specifications
- Technical knowledge requirements
- Industry-specific terminology
- Long training periods
Games excel at making complex information accessible. The more complex your product, the more value games provide in education.
Example: The HVAC design game teaches system design principles that normally require months of training. By gamifying it, contractors learn faster and retain better.
Professional Community Needs
Many boring B2B industries have tight professional communities:
- Trade associations
- Industry conferences
- Professional certifications
- Limited talent pools
Games become community builders and recruiting tools. The logistics game attracted potential employees and became a company culture symbol.
Case Studies from "Boring" Industries
Case Study 1: Maersk Line (Shipping/Logistics)
Industry: Container shipping
Boring Factor: 9/10
Game: "Captain's Challenge",manage shipping routes, optimize container loading, handle disruptions
Launch Context:
- Industry faced recruiting challenges (young talent saw shipping as unsexy)
- Complex operational concepts difficult to explain to prospects
- Brand awareness low outside industry
Game Mechanics:
- Route planning with real-time variables (weather, fuel prices, port congestion)
- Container optimization (Tetris-like loading challenges)
- Crisis management (handle equipment failures, delays, customs issues)
- Leaderboards and competitive seasons
- Educational content woven throughout gameplay
Results:
- 2.3M downloads in first 18 months
- 67% of players were outside industry (brand awareness tool)
- 43% of new hires mentioned game as first touchpoint with brand
- Trade press covered extensively (novelty in conservative industry)
- Customer engagement increased (clients played to understand complexities)
Key Success Factor: Game made complex, unsexy business engaging. In entertainment, it would be ignored. In shipping, it was revolutionary.
Case Study 2: Allianz (Insurance)
Industry: Commercial insurance
Boring Factor: 10/10
Game: "Allianz Risk Pulse",make business decisions, see risk consequences, learn mitigation strategies
Launch Context:
- Insurance is universally considered boring
- Buyers don't engage with marketing until crisis occurs
- Risk management education is valuable but ignored
- Massive competition for broker/agent attention
Game Mechanics:
- Business scenario simulations (fire, cyberattack, lawsuit, natural disaster)
- Decision trees with consequences
- Risk scoring and optimization
- Industry-specific scenarios (retail, manufacturing, healthcare)
- Certificate upon completion
Results:
- 340K business decision-makers played
- Average 23-minute engagement (vs. 2-minute whitepaper reads)
- 18% requested insurance quotes after playing (direct attribution)
- Broker adoption (used as client education tool)
- ROI: $7.3M in attributed premium vs. $400K development cost
Key Success Factor: Made risk management engaging through interactive scenarios. Taught while entertaining.
Case Study 3: Caterpillar (Heavy Equipment)
Industry: Construction equipment
Boring Factor: 8/10
Game: "Built For It Trials",operate heavy machinery in challenging scenarios
Launch Context:
- Complex equipment requires extensive operator training
- Dealer network needs engagement tools
- Younger generation entering construction trades
- Brand positioning for innovation
Game Mechanics:
- Realistic machinery operation simulations
- Progressive difficulty challenges
- Equipment comparison modes
- Multiplayer competitive events
- Equipment configurator integration
Results:
- 1.1M downloads (heavy equipment industry!)
- 89% completion rate for training modules
- Dealer adoption for customer engagement at trade shows
- Recruitment tool for operator training programs
- Brand positioning shift from "old industrial" to "innovative tech"
Key Success Factor: Made equipment operation accessible and engaging. Training tool that people actually wanted to use.
Why Boring Industries Should Act Now
First-Mover Advantage: In boring industries, there's still white space. Be first in your industry with gamification, and you own it.
Lowered Creative Barriers: You don't need to compete with gaming studios. Your competition is PowerPoint presentations. The bar is low.
Engagement Starvation: B2B professionals in boring industries are desperate for engaging content. They'll embrace anything that breaks the monotony.
ROI Clarity: In industries with small, defined audiences, attribution is easier. You can directly measure game impact on pipeline.
Competitive Moat: Once established as "the company with the game," it's hard to displace. Second-mover disadvantage is real.
Implementation Roadmap for Boring Industries
Phase 1: Strategic Justification
Identify Business Problem:
- Low engagement with marketing content?
- Recruitment challenges?
- Complex product education needs?
- Commodity market with weak differentiation?
Calculate Current Costs:
- Cost per lead (traditional methods)
- Training program costs
- Trade show effectiveness
- Recruitment marketing spend
Project Game ROI:
- Engagement lift (3-5x typical for boring industries)
- Lead quality improvement (behavioral qualification)
- Training cost reduction (self-serve education)
- Brand differentiation value
Phase 2: Game Concept Development
Choose Primary Objective:
- Lead generation (awareness/demand gen game)
- Customer education (training/onboarding game)
- Recruitment (employer branding game)
- Product demonstration (configurator/simulator game)
Design Core Mechanics:
- What industry knowledge does game teach?
- What skills does it develop?
- What decisions does player make?
- How does it connect to your business?
Scope Appropriately:
- Boring industries don't need AAA game production
- Simple, focused mechanics work better
- Mobile-first (B2B professionals play on phones)
- Web-based (no download friction for initial engagement)
Phase 3: Content Integration
Weave Product Throughout:
- Game mechanics should mirror real business challenges
- Scenarios should reflect actual use cases
- Solutions in game should demonstrate product value
- Educational content should be embedded, not appended
Industry Specificity:
- Use real industry terminology (builds credibility)
- Include actual business scenarios
- Reflect genuine industry challenges
- Incorporate regulatory/compliance elements if relevant
Expert Validation:
- Consult industry experts during development
- Beta test with current customers
- Ensure accuracy (credibility matters in B2B)
- Get feedback from technical staff
Phase 4: Launch Strategy
Industry Channel Focus:
- Trade publication coverage (novelty drives press)
- Industry association partnerships
- Trade show integration (booth becomes game station)
- Sales team enablement (demo tool for conversations)
- Email campaigns to existing contacts
Social Proof Building:
- Industry influencer involvement
- Early customer testimonials
- Usage statistics and engagement metrics
- Awards (innovation in conservative industry)
Sales Integration:
- Train sales team on game value proposition
- Provide game access as sales tool
- Track game engagement in CRM
- Follow up based on gameplay behavior
Phase 5: Optimization
Measure Everything:
- Engagement metrics (time, completion, return visits)
- Lead generation (registrations, information captured)
- Pipeline influence (game to opportunity conversion)
- Brand metrics (awareness, consideration, perception)
Iterate Based on Data:
- Which game elements drive most engagement?
- Where do players drop off?
- Which scenarios resonate most?
- How does game engagement correlate with sales outcomes?
Expand Strategically:
- New levels/challenges based on popularity
- Additional game modes for different use cases
- Mobile app if web version succeeds
- Multiplayer/competitive elements if engagement is strong
Common Objections from Boring Industries
"Our buyers are too serious for games":
B2B buyers are humans. Humans like games. The Maersk logistics game proved shipping professionals play games. Insurance professionals played Allianz's game. Your buyers will too.
"Our industry is too complex for games":
Complexity is exactly what games handle well. Flight simulators teach flying. Medical simulations teach surgery. Games can teach your industry.
"We don't have gaming expertise":
You don't need it. Hire a game development studio. Many specialize in B2B serious games. Your expertise is your industry:that's what makes the game credible.
"The ROI is uncertain":
Start small. Pilot with simple game. Measure engagement vs. traditional content. Boring industries see biggest engagement lifts:your ROI will be clear fast.
"It might damage our serious brand":
Depends on execution. Professional, well-designed game enhances brand. Cheap, silly game damages it. Investment level matters. But doing nothing while competitors innovate also damages brand.
"Our budget is limited":
Games range from $20K (simple) to $500K (complex). Even lower end delivers ROI in boring industries because competitive bar is so low.
The Boring Industry Opportunity
Here's the truth: Boring industries are the biggest opportunity for branded games. Entertainment companies have to outcompete other entertainment. Boring industries just have to be less boring than their competitors:an incredibly low bar.
The logistics company didn't need to beat mobile gaming studios. They needed to beat PowerPoint presentations about supply chain optimization. They won by default.
The insurance company didn't compete with entertainment apps. They competed with PDF risk management guides. They won decisively.
The heavy equipment manufacturer didn't face gaming industry competition. They faced product brochures. They dominated.
If you're in a boring industry, that's your advantage. The bar is so low that any gamification effort stands out dramatically. You don't need to be great at games. You just need to be better than everyone else's bland marketing.
Action Plan
If you're in a boring industry considering gamification:
- Week 1: Calculate current costs (per lead, per training, per recruitment, per engagement hour)
- Week 2: Research game examples from other boring industries
- Week 3: Identify your specific business problem gamification solves
- Week 4: Scope potential game concept (objectives, mechanics, integration)
- Week 5-6: Get bids from game development studios
- Week 7: Build business case and ROI projection
- Week 8: Present to leadership with competitive landscape (what competitors aren't doing)
The companies that gamify first in boring industries win by default. There's still time to be first in most industries. But that window is closing as awareness spreads.
Boring industries have the biggest gamification opportunity because the competitive bar is lowest, buyer expectations are minimal, and first-mover advantage is strongest. While sexy industries fight over attention with increasingly sophisticated tactics, boring industries can win with basic gamification simply by being the only one doing it. The less exciting your industry, the more impact games will have. If you're selling insurance, logistics, industrial equipment, or any other "boring" product:you should be building games before your competitors do.
More Articles You Might Like
The Mystery Box Mechanic: How Unknown Rewards Drive 4x More Participation
Variable reward systems generate 387% more repeat actions than predictable rewards. Curiosity gap theory and dopamine research reveal why mystery drives motivation.
Turning Procurement Hell Into Playful Vendor Evaluation
Enterprise procurement is painful for everyone involved. What if the RFP process was actually engaging? How gamification transforms vendor evaluation from dread into experience.
Negative Points Work Better Than Positive Points (Here's the Science)
Gamification systems using point deduction maintain 3.4x higher engagement than reward-only systems. Loss aversion psychology explains why penalties outperform prizes.