Customers Hoard Points They'll Never Redeem (Here's Why)
Billions of dollars in loyalty points sit unredeemed in customer accounts. The psychology behind this hoarding behavior reveals surprising truths about reward program design.
Customers Hoard Points They'll Never Redeem (Here's Why)
An estimated $100 billion in loyalty points sits unredeemed globally. Customers earn them, check their balances, and then... nothing. The points accumulate while redemption rates stay stubbornly low.
This seems irrational. Points have value. Customers chose to earn them. Yet they don't use them.
Understanding why reveals important truths about human psychology and practical implications for loyalty program design.
The Hoarding Numbers
The scale of unredeemed loyalty currency is staggering:
- Airline miles: $29 billion unredeemed in US programs
- Credit card points: Estimated $16 billion sitting in accounts
- Retail loyalty: Billions more in store-specific points
- Hotel programs: Trillions of points in global hotel programs
Redemption rates vary by program, but most see 50-70% of earned points eventually redeemed. The rest expires, is forfeited, or sits indefinitely.
This breakage benefits companies financially. Unredeemed points are essentially free customer acquisition, earning without the cost of reward fulfillment.
But the psychology behind hoarding is more interesting than the accounting.
The Psychology of Not Redeeming
Several psychological mechanisms explain why customers don't spend points they've earned:
Option Value Preservation
Points represent options, the possibility of future redemption for various rewards. Spending points eliminates options.
Psychologist Sheena Iyengar's research shows that people value keeping options open, sometimes irrationally so. The flexibility of unspent points feels more valuable than any specific redemption.
"I might need these points for something better" becomes permanent postponement.
The Savings Mentality
Many customers treat loyalty points like savings accounts. Just as people feel good watching their bank balance grow, they feel good watching points accumulate.
This savings mentality makes spending feel like depletion. The satisfaction of a large balance exceeds the satisfaction of redemption, even when the redemption provides genuine value.
Loss Aversion in Action
Spending points triggers loss aversion. The points feel owned; spending them feels like losing something.
Research consistently shows losses hurt more than equivalent gains feel good. The psychological "loss" of spending 50,000 points outweighs the psychological "gain" of receiving a $500 reward.
The Aspiration Trap
Many programs display premium rewards requiring massive point balances: first-class flights, luxury hotel stays, exclusive experiences.
Customers often save toward these aspirational rewards without realistic assessment of whether they'll ever accumulate enough points. The aspiration creates hoarding behavior even when attainable rewards would provide more value.
"I'm saving for a first-class ticket to Paris" sounds better than "I redeemed for a $25 gift card."
Complexity Barriers
Complicated redemption processes create friction that discourages action:
- Blackout dates and availability restrictions
- Multiple redemption options with unclear values
- Points plus cash requirements that require calculation
- Expiration rules that create confusion
Each friction point gives customers reason to postpone redemption. "I'll figure this out later" becomes never.
The Time Discount Problem
Redemption requires effort now for benefit later. Earning happens automatically; spending requires decision and action.
Humans heavily discount future value compared to present effort. The effort of choosing a reward and executing redemption exceeds the perceived value of receiving the reward, so customers defer.
Analysis Paralysis
Programs with many redemption options can trigger choice overload. Research shows that too many options can prevent any choice at all.
"Should I use points for flights or hotels? For statement credits or merchandise? For this redemption or save for better value?"
Unable to determine the optimal choice, customers make no choice.
The Perceived Value Problem
Points often carry perceived value that doesn't match actual value:
Inflated Sense of Worth
Currency abstraction makes points feel more valuable than they are. 50,000 points sounds substantial even if the cash value is modest.
This inflated perception makes customers reluctant to spend. "50,000 points is a lot" creates saving behavior even when redemption would be rational.
Anchoring on High Values
Customers anchor on the highest-value redemptions (often travel) when evaluating their points. A balance of 20,000 points gets evaluated against first-class flight pricing, not coffee purchases.
This anchoring makes smaller redemptions feel like "waste" even when they provide good value relative to earning effort.
The Endowment Effect
Owning points makes them feel more valuable than identical unowned points. The endowment effect inflates perceived value of accumulated balances.
Once customers feel wealthy in points, they're reluctant to "spend down" that wealth.
Why Some Customers Do Redeem
Understanding redeemers helps illuminate the hoarding problem:
Clear Redemption Goals
Customers with specific redemption targets, a planned trip, a desired product, redeem at higher rates. The goal provides decision framework that eliminates analysis paralysis.
Expiration Pressure
Points that will expire create urgency that overcomes hoarding tendency. The impending loss motivates action.
Simple Redemption Options
Programs with simple, obvious redemption paths see higher redemption. "Points equal dollars at checkout" creates friction-free spending.
Small Balance Holders
Counterintuitively, customers with smaller balances often redeem at higher rates. Large balances create "wealth" psychology that inhibits spending. Small balances don't trigger the same preservation instinct.
Immediate Gratification Options
Redemption options that provide immediate value (statement credits, instant discounts) see higher uptake than delayed gratification options (future travel, shipped merchandise).
The Business Implications
Point hoarding creates strategic questions for loyalty program operators:
Is Breakage Good or Bad?
From pure accounting perspective, unredeemed points are good: liability without fulfillment cost.
But from relationship perspective, unredeemed points represent failed engagement. Customers who don't redeem don't experience the positive feelings that rewards should generate. Their loyalty may be weaker than active redeemers.
Does Hoarding Indicate Program Failure?
High hoarding rates might indicate:
- Redemption options aren't valuable enough
- The process is too complicated
- Customers don't understand their options
- Earning outpaces realistic redemption opportunity
These issues suggest program improvements needed.
Should You Encourage Redemption?
Some companies actively encourage redemption:
- Reminder communications about balances
- Simplified redemption options
- Small-value redemption opportunities
- Expiration policies that create urgency
Others prefer passive hoarding that reduces fulfillment costs.
The right approach depends on whether you view loyalty programs as relationship builders or accounting entries.
Design Strategies to Reduce Hoarding
If redemption engagement is your goal, several strategies help:
Create Redemption Goals
Help customers identify specific redemption targets:
- "Your points could get you X"
- "You're Y points away from Z reward"
- "Members like you often redeem for..."
Goals provide decision framework that enables action.
Simplify Options
Reduce redemption options to decrease paralysis:
- Clear value proposition per option
- Recommendation engines that suggest best redemptions
- "Most popular" and "best value" flags
Enable Small Redemptions
Allow low-balance redemptions that customers can use immediately:
- Points at checkout
- Small gift card denominations
- Statement credit minimums
Small redemptions create redemption habits that carry forward.
Remove Friction
Every step in redemption process creates dropout:
- One-click redemption where possible
- Clear availability without searching
- Instant delivery of digital rewards
Create Urgency Without Expiration
Instead of expiring points (which creates negative feelings), create urgency through:
- Limited-time bonus redemption values
- Exclusive rewards available briefly
- "Use it or lose it" promotions for bonus points only
Celebrate Redemption
Make redemption feel positive rather than depleting:
- Congratulatory messaging
- "Smart redemption" confirmation
- Social sharing of redemptions
Positive emotional association with spending reduces hoarding resistance.
When Hoarding Is Okay
Not all hoarding is problematic. Some scenarios where hoarding indicates healthy engagement:
Genuine Saving Toward Goals
Customers actively saving for specific redemptions are engaged, not stuck. Their hoarding is purposeful and will eventually convert.
Balance Creates Loyalty
Some customers stay loyal specifically to maintain their point balance. The accumulation itself creates retention value even without redemption.
Points as Status
For some customers, large point balances are status symbols. They may never redeem but remain highly loyal and engaged.
Low-Value Redemption Options
If your best redemption option provides poor value, customers are rational to hoard and wait for better options.
Application to Events
Event reward programs face similar hoarding dynamics:
Event Credit Hoarding
If attendees earn credits toward future events, they may hoard rather than attend. Design programs that encourage usage.
Complexity in Event Rewards
Too many redemption options (sessions, networking, content, merchandise) creates paralysis. Simplify choices.
Creating Event Urgency
Limited-time experiences create urgency that overcomes hoarding. "This speaker is only available this year" motivates redemption.
Small Redemption Options
Allow credits to be used for small enhancements (better seating, bonus content) rather than only large redemptions (full registration).
Clear Goals
Help attendees understand what their accumulated benefits can achieve. "Your engagement points qualify you for VIP reception access."
The billions in unredeemed loyalty points represent psychological complexity, not customer irrationality. Hoarding behavior reveals how we think about value, options, and loss. Understanding these dynamics helps design programs that create active engagement rather than passive accumulation. The goal isn't eliminating hoarding entirely, but ensuring that accumulated rewards eventually deliver the positive experiences that build genuine loyalty.
More Articles You Might Like
What Happens When You Over-Reward Your Best Customers
Conventional wisdom says reward your best customers generously. But research reveals a counterintuitive truth: excessive rewards can actually damage loyalty and reduce long-term value.
Hybrid Reward Programs: Combining Digital Points With Real-World Perks
The most effective loyalty programs blend digital earning with physical benefits. This hybrid approach captures advantages of both worlds while avoiding limitations of either.
Most Brands Get Personalized Rewards Wrong (Here's What Actually Works)
Personalization promises 3x higher engagement. Most implementations achieve nothing. The gap between personalization theory and practice reveals what actually drives individualized reward success.
