EventXGames
Back to Blog
8 min read

What Happens When You Over-Reward Your Best Customers

Conventional wisdom says reward your best customers generously. But research reveals a counterintuitive truth: excessive rewards can actually damage loyalty and reduce long-term value.

Ash Rahman

Ash Rahman

founder, eventXgames 🎮 crafting engaging branded games and playables for events, campaigns, and iGaming platforms 👨‍🚀 infj-t

#loyalty programs#customer retention#behavioral psychology#rewards strategy

What Happens When You Over-Reward Your Best Customers

The logic seems obvious: your best customers deserve the best rewards. They spend the most, visit the most, and contribute the most to revenue. Rewarding them generously should reinforce their loyalty.

But something strange happens when rewards become too generous. Customers start expecting them. The rewards lose meaning. And in some cases, loyalty actually decreases.

This reward saturation effect challenges fundamental assumptions about loyalty program design.

The Paradox of Generous Rewards

Research on reward psychology reveals several counterintuitive findings:

Entitlement Replaces Gratitude

When rewards are consistently generous, customers stop feeling grateful and start feeling entitled. What began as pleasant surprise becomes expected baseline.

This shift changes the emotional dynamic:

  • Early: "Wow, they gave me a bonus. How nice!"
  • Later: "Of course I got the bonus. I deserve it."
  • Eventually: "Where's my bonus? They owe me."

Entitlement doesn't build loyalty. It builds expectation that any reduction will disappoint.

Intrinsic Motivation Crowding

Psychologist Edward Deci's research showed that external rewards can reduce intrinsic motivation. People who enjoyed an activity for its own sake become less interested when rewards are introduced.

Applied to loyalty: customers who genuinely liked your brand might start engaging only for rewards. When you're the mechanism for receiving rewards rather than the reason for engagement, your brand relationship weakens.

The Reference Point Problem

Behavioral economics shows that people evaluate outcomes relative to reference points. Generous rewards become the reference point against which future rewards are judged.

Once someone receives a 20% discount, a 15% discount feels like a penalty. The reference point ratchets upward, making it increasingly difficult to satisfy expectations.

Reduced Price Sensitivity

Research on loyalty programs finds that heavily rewarded customers can become less price sensitive in ways that seem positive but aren't.

They stop comparing value because rewards obscure the comparison. But this means they're not choosing you because you're better. They're choosing you because of rewards inertia. If rewards change, they'll suddenly notice competitors.

The Reward Saturation Cycle

Over-rewarding often follows a predictable cycle:

Phase 1: Delight

Initial rewards create genuine delight. Customers feel appreciated. Engagement increases. The program appears successful.

Phase 2: Expectation

Repeated generous rewards become expected. Customers no longer feel surprised or grateful. The emotional impact diminishes while costs remain.

Phase 3: Entitlement

Customers now expect generous rewards as a condition of their continued engagement. Any reduction triggers negative reaction.

Phase 4: Escalation Pressure

To restore delight, program managers increase rewards further. This provides temporary improvement but accelerates the cycle.

Phase 5: Unsustainability

Reward costs become unsustainable. Reduction becomes necessary but damages customer relationships.

The cycle ends in worse position than if rewards had been moderate all along.

Case Study: The Grocery Loyalty Trap

Consider a common grocery loyalty scenario:

A grocery chain offers its best customers (top 10% by spending) increasingly generous rewards: personalized discounts, bonus points, exclusive offers.

Year 1: Heavy discounts delight customers. Satisfaction scores rise. The program is celebrated internally.

Year 2: Customers expect the discounts. Same rewards generate less enthusiasm. Program costs pressure margins.

Year 3: To cut costs, rewards are modestly reduced. Customer complaints spike. Some defect to competitors.

Year 4: Analysis shows that heavily rewarded customers aren't more loyal than moderately rewarded ones. They just expect more.

The generous rewards created expectations without building proportionally stronger relationships.

The Science of Optimal Reward Levels

Research suggests principles for avoiding over-reward:

Variable Over Fixed

As discussed previously, variable rewards maintain impact better than fixed rewards. Occasional generous rewards preserve surprise. Constant generous rewards create entitlement.

Earned Over Given

Rewards that feel earned maintain meaning longer than rewards that feel automatic. If customers understand why they received something (specific behavior), gratitude persists. If rewards arrive without connection to action, entitlement develops faster.

Soft Over Hard

Non-monetary rewards (recognition, access, experiences) can be generous without creating the same entitlement dynamics. Status and acknowledgment don't establish the same reference points that discounts and freebies do.

Intermittent Generosity

Occasional exceptional treatment maintains specialness better than consistent exceptional treatment. The best customer experience might be mostly good with occasional great, rather than constantly great.

Signs of Over-Reward

How do you know if you're over-rewarding?

Declining Satisfaction Despite Increasing Rewards

If satisfaction isn't improving even as rewards increase, you've hit saturation. More isn't creating more happiness.

Rising Entitlement Language

Listen to customer communications. Phrases like "I expect," "I deserve," "Why didn't I get" suggest entitlement has replaced gratitude.

Cost Acceleration

If reward costs grow faster than customer value, the program may be over-rewarding. Sustainable programs maintain relationship between value delivered and value received.

Competitive Vulnerability

If your best customers would leave for any competitor offering similar rewards, their loyalty is to the rewards, not to you. That's over-reward driven artificial retention.

Negative Response to Any Reduction

Customers who react angrily to modest reward reductions have been trained to expect unsustainable treatment.

Strategies for Right-Sizing Rewards

If you've over-rewarded, correction is possible but requires care:

Shift to Experiential Rewards

Transition from discounts and freebies to experiences and recognition. Experiential rewards create less entitlement while maintaining engagement.

Instead of: "Here's 25% off"
Try: "You're invited to our exclusive preview event"

Add Earning Requirements

Make rewards more contingent on specific behaviors. The connection between action and reward maintains meaning.

Instead of: Automatic quarterly bonus
Try: "Complete these three actions to unlock your quarterly bonus"

Introduce Variability

Reduce fixed rewards while adding variable surprise rewards. Total reward value might stay similar while entitlement decreases.

Reframe the Value Proposition

Shift communications from reward accumulation to relationship value. Emphasize why the relationship matters beyond points.

Gradual Adjustment

If reduction is necessary, implement gradually. Sudden reduction triggers loss aversion. Gradual shifts are less noticed and less resented.

Invest in Service Instead

Redirect reward spending toward service improvement. Better customer experience often creates more loyalty than bigger rewards.

The Elite Customer Challenge

The highest-spending customers present special challenges:

They're Already Maxed

Top customers often can't spend significantly more. Additional rewards buy zero incremental revenue.

They Have Leverage

Big customers know their value. They'll use reward programs as negotiation leverage.

They're Sophisticated

Elite customers calculate value precisely. They'll extract maximum reward value while giving minimum incremental loyalty.

They Set Expectations

Treatment of elite customers creates expectations for aspiring customers. Over-rewarding elites sets unsustainable precedent.

They Might Be Unprofitable

Some "best" customers, when reward costs are factored in, generate negative value. Heavy rewards can turn profitable relationships unprofitable.

The Role of Recognition Over Reward

Recognition often works better than reward for top customers:

Status Acknowledgment

Acknowledging elite status through titles, badges, and visibility provides psychological reward without creating cost entitlement.

Personal Attention

A personal call from a senior executive creates more loyalty than a large discount. Personal attention feels valuable because it's scarce.

Access and Exclusivity

Early access, insider information, and exclusive events provide value without establishing monetary reference points.

Community Membership

Belonging to elite communities (advisory boards, founding member groups) creates identity-based loyalty that survives reward changes.

Voice and Influence

Giving top customers voice in product development or company direction creates investment that transcends transactional rewards.

Application to Events

Event loyalty programs face similar over-reward risks:

VIP Inflation

When everyone becomes VIP, VIP means nothing. Reserve premium treatment for truly exceptional engagement.

Discount Dependency

If loyal attendees expect significant discounts, you've created a price expectation that's hard to reverse. Consider whether loyalty benefits should be value-add rather than discount.

Experiential Over Monetary

Event rewards should emphasize experiences: speaker access, exclusive sessions, networking opportunities. These don't create the same entitlement as price reductions.

Earning Requirements

Tie event benefits to specific engagement: referrals, community participation, content creation. The connection to behavior maintains meaning.

Recognition Focus

Publicly recognizing loyal attendees, featuring their contributions, and acknowledging their journey creates loyalty that reward accumulation cannot.

The Balance Point

Optimal loyalty programs find balance:

Enough to Appreciate

Rewards should be meaningful enough that customers notice and appreciate them.

Not Enough to Expect

Rewards shouldn't be so consistent and generous that they become entitled expectations.

Varied to Surprise

Variability prevents the reference point ratchet that drives entitlement.

Connected to Behavior

Clear connection between action and reward maintains meaning.

Sustainable Long-Term

Reward levels should be economically sustainable without requiring future reduction.


The most loyal customers aren't necessarily the most rewarded ones. They're the ones who value your relationship beyond what they receive from it. When rewards become so generous that they're the reason for the relationship, you've created a fragile loyalty that will evaporate when rewards change. True loyalty survives reward fluctuation because it's built on something more substantial than transaction.

More Articles You Might Like

Ready to Transform Your Events?

Discover how eventXgames can help you create engaging experiences that drive real results.

Get Started